Guidance for evaluating humanitarian assistance in complex emergencies.
Read Online
Share

Guidance for evaluating humanitarian assistance in complex emergencies.

  • 611 Want to read
  • ·
  • 74 Currently reading

Published by OECD in Paris .
Written in English


Book details:

Edition Notes

SeriesEvaluation and aid effectiveness -- no.1
ContributionsOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Development Assistance Committee. Working Party on Aid Evaluation.
The Physical Object
Pagination42p. :
Number of Pages42
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL20686274M

Download Guidance for evaluating humanitarian assistance in complex emergencies.

PDF EPUB FB2 MOBI RTF

Get this from a library! Guidance for evaluating humanitarian assistance in complex emergencies.. [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.; DAC Working Party on Aid Evaluation.;] -- Evaluation is a key tool in improving the quality and effectiveness of development co-operation. The Development Assistance Committee (DAC) Working Party in Aid Evaluation is the only international. Get this from a library! Evaluation and Aid Effectiveness No. 1 - Guidance for Evaluating Humanitarian Assistance in Complex Emergencies. [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.;] -- Abstract: Evaluation is a key tool in improving the quality and effectiveness of development co-operation. The Development Assistance Committee (DAC) Working Party in Aid Evaluation is the only. GUIDANCE FOR EVALUATING HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE IN COMPLEX EMERGENCIES 1. Introduction Due to the comparatively recent and limited body of evaluative literature on humanitarian assistance, identifying good practice has involved the use of a variety of complementary sources and methods and extensive consultations and Size: KB.   Humanitarian Assistance in Emergencies: Non-Statutory Guidance on Establishing Humanitarian Assistance Centres PDF, KB, 58 pages This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Evaluation and Aid Effectiveness No. 1 - Guidance for Evaluating Humanitarian Assistance in Complex Emergencies Evaluation is a key tool in improving the quality and effectiveness of . Over the last 15 years, there has been a rising demand for accountability by humanitarian actors, this is especially true in chronic, long-term complex emergencies where the criteria of. “RRN Good Practice Review: Evaluating Humanitarian Assistance Programmes in Complex Emergencies”, the second was the DAC “Guidance for Evaluating Humanitarian Assistance in Complex Emergencies”. Despite their commonality in titles, the two booklets aimed at. Evaluation is a key tool in efforts to improve accountability and performance in the operation of the international humanitarian aid system. However, humanitarian aid has been subjected to less rigorous monitoring and evaluation procedures than those applied to development aid. As the share of overseas development assistance allocated to humanitarian aid has risen, and awareness Read more».

HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE MONITORING Guidance 4 Relationship between Planning and Monitoring Strategic response planning and response monitoring are two distinct elements of the humanitarian programme cycle, that have strong linkages at three levels: 1. This handbook focuses on effective malaria control responses to complex emergencies, particularly during the acute phase when reliance on international humanitarian assistance is greatest. Topics covered: initial assessment and planning; surveillance; outbreak preparedness and response; case management; prevention; community participation and. DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE EVALUATION AND AID EFFECTIVENESS 5 No. 1 - Guidance for Evaluating Humanitarian Assistance In Complex Emergencies No. 2 - Evaluating Country Programmes Vienna Workshop, No. 3 - Donor Support for Institutional Capacity Development in Environment: Lessons Learned No. 4 - Effective Practices in Conducting a. The DAC evaluation criteria are currently at the heart of the evaluation of humanitarian action (EHA) - including within evaluations themselves and as part of agency guidance. However, several criteria are not well understood; their use is often mechanistic, and excludes more creative evaluation processes.